fair_trade_for_all
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
fair_trade_for_all [2010/11/18 21:49] dan |
fair_trade_for_all [2011/11/16 12:00] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 639: | Line 639: | ||
| * China had to accept an extraordinary right of other members to use safeguards against it (beyond GATT [[http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gatt47_02_e.htm#articleXIX|Article XIX]] and in violation of MFN) | * China had to accept an extraordinary right of other members to use safeguards against it (beyond GATT [[http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gatt47_02_e.htm#articleXIX|Article XIX]] and in violation of MFN) | ||
| * some LDCs have bound export subsidies at zero (far beyond many developed countries' commitments) | * some LDCs have bound export subsidies at zero (far beyond many developed countries' commitments) | ||
| - | + | ||
| > It seems strange that the WTO's developed country members should force acceding countries, particularly small and poor countries like Cambodia and Nepal, into such strong concessions. Grynberg and Joy (2000) suggest that the motivation lies in the developed countries' desire to create a precedent that can be applied to future negotiations. ---p161 | > It seems strange that the WTO's developed country members should force acceding countries, particularly small and poor countries like Cambodia and Nepal, into such strong concessions. Grynberg and Joy (2000) suggest that the motivation lies in the developed countries' desire to create a precedent that can be applied to future negotiations. ---p161 | ||
fair_trade_for_all.txt ยท Last modified: 2011/11/16 12:00 (external edit)
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
